Wednesday, December 21, 2022

CONTACT - THE TRICKY BIT

 A reader contacted the blog a while back to agree that mealtimes, eating, and food in general seem to be pretty much the constant headache with most children coming into care.

But I find myself right now enmired in the other big one; Contact.

Contact, if you don't know, is a legal requirement. It's a perfectly well-meaning requirement too. 

It's just SO hard to make it work.

And tagged on to the end of every single Contact I've been involved in, is the TRICKY BIT.

Fostering folk, and in our case Blue Sky, beaver away to get the best from it for our children, but it ain't easy.

In a nutshell; a child in care must have contact with a significant other once a week.

Obviously parents head the list, but brothers and sisters are put forward too. Step-parents as well sometimes.

So; the idea is that chidren don't lose touch with their family, because one day, it's always hoped, they can be re-united with them and the bonds won't have been damaged too much.

In practice, Contact throws the child off balance. For a bunch of reasons;

Maybe their parents weren't very nice to them. Maybe the child was left believing that the break-up of the family was her fault. Maybe they're scared to go back at all. Maybe they don't understand why they can't go home with their parents and instead have to go back to a strange house.

Whatever the reasons, I find too often that the child makes progress during the week, then gets taken to Contact and ends up upset, confused and frightened, and the foster parents have to start all over again.

So, here I am now with a child who is transitioning from female to male, and making a damn good job of it. He's sensible, intelligent, self-aware and courageous.

But his father views his son's decision as a personal afront and continues to call him by the female name he was given (by the father), and refer to him as "she".

Nor surprisingly the child (late teens) is upset and hurt. I've heard raised voices (the foster parent is not permitted to be in the room when Contact happens).

Parents and children are often at loggerheads, nothing new there.

But in my view, in this case, the levels of anger and belligerance involved are unacceptable. There is a mediator present, my understanding is that they try to keep things civil, but when I drive him back to our house afterwards he's distraught.

If it was a workplace situation the father would be interviewed about his conduct, perhaps sent for guidance training. But parents and their children aren't colleagues of each other; parents have historically had almost absolute autonomy over their children, and for many it's a heady experience; to have near total control of another.

All the humble foster parent can do is help and support the child, in every way we can.

The TRICKY BIT?

Children coming into care always have issues with their parents, how could they not?

They often aren't aware of half of the issues they have, especially the younger ones.

They might be frightened of their parents, they might be angry with them. They might resent one or other of them. They might even dislike them.

But. And here's the tricky bit. As a foster parent, you have to skirt around being critical of the child's parents.

You can extend every bit of support you can to the child, but you stop short of dissing their mum or dad.

What do you say?

As little as possible.

If you say anything at all, it's usually best to hint at a bit of sympathy for the parents. Maybe "they're going through a rough time" - that sometimes works.

And then get the conversation back to distraction. Put the radio on and let them choose the music. Pull into a petrol station and let them choose a bag of sweets. Ask what movie they want to watch on Saturday, and whether they want pizza or a Maccy D.

Distraction. The foster parent's best friend.

For the record I learned it as a kid getting an injection for something or other. The doctor told me to look away, then she said "I'm going to count to three then I'll put the needle in. Okay?' I nodded. Then she said "All done!" She'd got me so focussed on hearing "One, two three" that she put the needle in and gave me the injection while I was busy steeling myself. I didn't feel a thing.






4 comments:

  1. "I find too often that the child makes progress during the week, then gets taken to Contact and ends up upset, confused and frightened, and the foster parents have to start all over again." This has been our experience too. It can bring up trauma, stir up emotions and gives the worst parents a chance to rub in what the kids are missing at home, or guilt trip them into how much they are missed or needed at home (like its the kid's fault they are in care).

    Our current duo have a lot of contact with all sorts of immediate and extended family. At least 2 x 2 hour sessions per week, sometimes 3 sessions if there are more family on the schedule for that week. So that gives us a Monday to Thursday of the kids being unsettled the night before, unsettled the night contact takes place and sometimes for a day or so after. And it means any after school activities are out of the question most nights.

    But perhaps what we have felt most with this one is how it has prevented us bonding with the kids. They see and treat us as some kind of extended babysitting service, they are so sure they are going "home" soon they don’t see any reason to know us or settling in. We've never had kids live with us for this long who still call their parents place (which they have not seen for over 7 months) "home" and the place they live with us as "your house". I'm hoping the family can resolve their issues and get on the right track for these kids to go back, as I don't know how they will cope if they end up in care permanently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. These are profound insights of yours Mooglet, really eye-opening.
    It hadn't occurred to me that Contact makes the children think they're going home anytime soon, so their foster family seems to them just an incubator.
    How would you change/improve the matter of maintaining appropriate relationships between fostered children and their significant others?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. That is a really good question, and as SFC says there is no one size fits all approach when it comes to contact, including how to balance maintaining family relationships while also allowing the children to settle in and form a good relationship with Foster Carers.

      Social workers can help by being clear with expectations and timelines, and communicating these with all parties including the kids. This can be tricky as they are often struggling with high workloads, shifting deadlines and drifting delays due to resource issues.

      I think one of the biggest things parents can do to help the whole situation is demonstrating respect for the social workers and carer, and working together to ensure the best for the kids.

      We try to never criticize or disapprove of parents behaviour and care of the child in front of the child. It is best for all parties if family can do the same for carers.

      Sadly, the odd parent will act like they are in a custody battle with us (the foster carer).
      This can include criticizing our care or taking actions that make life difficult for all parties. Examples include a child coming back from contact saying things like “Mummy hates when you put my hair in a ponytail” or make timewasting allegations like reporting the child was not in clean clothes, as they had paint on their top - when the parent is well aware that the child does art and crafts at school then goes directly to contact.

      (The reporting real concerns to social workers totally understandable by the way, it must be scary that your child’s wellbeing is in the hands of a stranger).

      Perhaps there are lessons that could be learned from how joint custody is handled when parents separate – although that seems to be a minefield too.

      Delete
  3. Gosh Mooglet, sounds like Contact is a job in itself for you.
    It's seemingly impossible to get Contact tailored to the real needs of the children, rather it seems to be a one-size-fits-all sort of immovable monolith.
    You and I have no doubt it could be better. The government of the day meant well when they imposed it as a 'must do', but a bit of flexibility would work wonders.
    I wish you and I had time to campaign for a change. It would save government money in travel expenses and facility hire - that's the sort of thing that gets attention, rather than the core thing, which is the child's welfare.

    ReplyDelete